Abstract
We consider an investor with $10,000 who contributes $500 monthly for 40 years, earning a 6.4% nominal gross return with inflation at 2.5%. Raising the annual fee from 0.03% to 0.66% reduces terminal wealth from $434,479 to $363,095 in today’s dollars — the difference, $71,384, amounts to 20.7% of the lifetime investment gains the market provided. We show the cost of fees compounds geometrically, survives every simulated market path, and is the largest determinant of terminal wealth under the saver’s direct control.
Saver profile
Market assumptions — the world
Portfolio: 80% equities · 20% bonds
Fee scenarios — the subject
| Scenario | Terminal (real) | Cost of fee | Share of gains | Catch-up | Wealth ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross (frictionless) | $438,242 | — | — | — | 1.00 |
| 0.03%· Total-market index | $434,479 | −$3,763 | 1.1% | 2 mo | 0.991 |
| 0.07%· Peer index | $429,516 | −$8,727 | 2.5% | 4 mo | 0.980 |
| 0.66%· Typical active fund | $363,095 | −$75,147 | 21.8% | 3 yr 1 mo | 0.829 |
Four basis points sounds like nothing. Held for 40 years, the difference between 0.03% and 0.07% on this saver’s path is $13,326 in nominal terms — $4,963 in today’s dollars. Whether that is “nothing” is a question about your hourly wage, not about arithmetic.
| 0.03% | $1,166,604 | $434,479 |
| 0.07% | $1,153,277 | $429,516 |
| Difference | $13,326 | $4,963 |
| Fee | Nominal | Real |
|---|
Inflation is the one fee no provider will waive. At 2.5% annually, money loses half its purchasing power every 28.1 yr — which is why this paper reports real dollars by default.
Equities have historically paid a premium over bonds for bearing their volatility. The ladder below prices that premium under our assumptions — and prices the safety of leaving it unclaimed.
| Equity weight | Deterministic (real) | MC median | MC 5th pct. | P(beat inflation) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% equity | $232,261 | — | — | — |
| 20% equity | $270,433 | — | — | — |
| 40% equity | $315,853 | — | — | — |
| 60% equity | $369,958 | — | — | — |
| 80% equitycurrent | $434,479 | — | — | — |
| 100% equity | $511,489 | — | — | — |
Deterministic engine. Monthly recursion with the contribution at month end, net growth factor ((1+g_p)(1−f))^(1/12), contributions growing annually by g_c. The portfolio return is the blend g_p = w·g_e + (1−w)·g_b (6.40% here); the deterministic engine ignores rebalancing and volatility interactions — the Monte Carlo handles those properly. Real figures deflate by (1+π)^(m/12).
Monte Carlo. A two-asset monthly model with a geometric (median-growth) parameterization: the median compound growth equals g, while the arithmetic mean is higher by the volatility drag σ_p²/2 = 0.84%. Monthly log-returns use a Box–Muller pair per month from a mulberry32 stream.
Common random numbers. One set of monthly draws is shared by every fee scenario — fees do not move markets — so scenario differences are pure fee effects. This is the paper’s methodological signature. Every base path is paired with its sign-flipped antithetic twin for variance reduction.
Seed & paths. Seed 42 — same seed and inputs reproduce bit-identical results. Currently 10,000 effective paths.
Analytic cross-check. For a pure lump sum, the terminal-wealth ratio between two fees is exactly ((1−f₂)/(1−f₁))^T = 0.776566. On this saver’s contributing path the realized ratio is 0.835703 (contributions enter at different times, so the two differ slightly).
Delay cost. The smallest number of extra months the fee-paying saver must keep contributing (at the year-T rate, growth still net of fee) for the balance to reach the frictionless terminal, capped at 1,200 months.
Limitations. No taxes, no stochastic inflation, no withdrawal phase, no glide paths, and a single annual fee drag per scenario. Total contributions here are $250,000; the two extreme loaded fees are 0.03% and 0.66%. Educational model output, not advice.
Continue the series →
№2 A Wide & Deep Pond
Why diversification is the solved core of retirement investing — and an honest price on gambling anyway.
Solved Problems in Personal Finance
№1 The Arithmetic of Fees·№2 A Wide & Deep Pond·№3 The Yield Illusion
Support this work
bitcoin accepted with thanks
bc1qsk0m…2ujww